 Why Weight Loss Is So Hard (And How To Finally Make It Work) In the first post in this series we covered the reasons why it is so easy to gain weight in modern life. In the second post I covered what we can start doing about it. Let's tie it all together in this last article. You’ve probably been told some version of this before: “Just be more disciplined.” “Stick to the plan.” “Try harder this time.” And if you’ve struggled to lose weight or keep it off, you’ve probably assumed the problem is you. It’s not. The real problem is that you're trying to change your body inside a system that is working against you and unless you understand that system, you’ll keep repeating the same cycle. The Reality Most People Don’t Tell You Around 80% of people who lose weight regain it. It's not because they don’t know what to do or because they lack motivation. But a combination of:
Most people start strong. They lose some weight then life happens. They lapse → regain → try again → repeat. It’s the default pattern for many diets and weight loss attempts. You’re Fighting Two Forces (Not One) When you try to lose weight, you’re dealing with two major tensions: 1. Your Biology Pushes Back Your body doesn’t want you to lose weight. When you diet:
Even more frustrating is that a lot of this happens outside your awareness. You think you’re still “on track" but your energy intake slowly creeps up over time. 2. Your Psychology Pulls You Back At the same time, you’re trying to:
And this creates a conflict of: Old habits vs new behaviours You want to change but you also want comfort, convenience, and pleasure. That tension is real and it’s one of the biggest reasons diets don’t last. Why Willpower Isn’t The Answer This is where most people go wrong. They treat weight loss like a discipline problem. But willpower is finite, unreliable and highly influenced by stress, fatigue, and your environment. You can make great decisions at 8am and completely different ones at 8pm. And it's not because you’re weak, it's because your system is overloaded. The People Who Succeed Do This Differently The data is clear:
Even the most successful people:
There is no perfect run, just better systems. What Actually Works (A Better Approach) Instead of relying on willpower you need a system. A multi-component approach. That means combining:
And making it fit your life, not the other way around. The Missing Piece: Understanding Yourself Here’s where this gets interesting. People don’t all eat for the same reasons. Some people eat for:
And if you don’t understand your drivers, you’ll pick the wrong strategy. For Example:
This is why “one-size-fits-all diets” fail. If Your Plan Feels Miserable, It Won’t Last This might be the most important point in the entire series: If your approach reduces your overall enjoyment of life, it’s unlikely to be sustainable. You’re not just trying to lose weight, you’re trying to build a way of living you can actually maintain. That means:
The 5 Principles To Make This Work If you take nothing else from this, take this: 1. Use evidence-based strategies. Don’t rely on trends, hacks, or guesswork. 2. Expect resistance. Your body and mind will push back so plan for it. 3. Track what matters. Awareness beats guesswork. 4. Understand your behaviour. Know why you eat, not just what you eat. 5. Keep pleasure in the plan. If it feels like punishment, it won’t last. Final Thought Weight loss isn’t about finding the perfect diet. It’s about:
The people who succeed aren’t more disciplined. They’re just better at playing the game.
5 Comments
 What Can We Do About It?
In the first post, we looked at why so many people gain weight in the modern world. We are running ancient software in a very modern environment. Our brains evolved in a world where food was scarce. Now we live in a world where food is everywhere, available 24/7 and designed to make us want more. So the obvious next question is: What can we do about it? The frustrating answer is that there is no single fix. No magic diet. No fat-burning supplement. No metabolism hack. No product you can wear, drink or rub onto your skin. (Although - the drugs are doing a good job now) The weight loss industry is full of promises to “lose 10lbs in a week” or “boost your metabolism instantly.” Those claims are everywhere because they are exciting and because we all want an easier answer. But they are not true. You cannot lose 10lbs of body fat in a week. We still have to obey the laws of thermodynamics. If something promises to “hack” the energy balance equation, it is probably not evidence-based. The problem is not that people are lazy. The problem is that people are surrounded by tempting promises in an environment that makes weight gain easy and long-term weight loss difficult. Why Most Diets Fail Most diets try to solve the problem in one of three ways:
That is why there are so many different diets:
They all sound different but most of them are really doing the same thing: They are trying to get you to eat less. The problem is that most people do not stick with them. The average person in a large commercial weight loss programme lasts around six or seven weeks. Not because they are weak, because being hungry, feeling restricted and constantly thinking about food is exhausting. The best diet is not the perfect diet. It is the diet you can still follow six months from now. And one year from now. What the Evidence Actually Says When researchers look at the big picture, not just one study or one trendy headline, a few things matter more than anything else. The biggest factor is energy density. That means how many calories are packed into each gram of food. Foods that are high in calories but small in volume make it very easy to eat more than we realise. Think:
These foods are usually high in fat and sugar, low in water and easy to eat quickly. They are highly rewarding, but not very filling. On the other hand, foods that are lower in energy density help us feel fuller with fewer calories. These foods tend to have:
Think:
According to the Professor James Stubbs, the characteristics of an evidence-based diet are surprisingly simple:
That last point matters more than most people realise. If your diet is miserable, you will not stay on it. Why We Eat When We Are Not Hungry One of the most useful ideas from the lecture I attended is that we do not only eat because we are hungry. We eat because:
That is why willpower is such an unreliable strategy. You can make a great decision at 8am, then have a stressful day, skip lunch, walk into the kitchen at 8pm and suddenly the biscuits “just happen.” This is not because you have failed. It's because you are human. Professor Stubbs calls this “dual processing.” Part of the brain wants the long-term goal and the other part wants immediate comfort, pleasure and relief. And in a world where food is cheap, easy and constantly available, the short-term part often wins. Why Exercise Helps Less Than People Think Most people believe exercise is the main way to lose weight and it does help but not in the way most people think. Exercise alone tends to produce surprisingly small changes in body weight. Even diet and exercise together often produce average weight losses of less than 5% of body weight. Why? Because creating a large calorie deficit through exercise is hard especially if somebody is already overweight, unfit or exhausted. The less fit you are, the harder exercise feels and that does not mean it isn't working. It just means exertion feels much greater when fitness is low. This is why “go hard or go home” often backfires. The evidence suggests something much simpler: Start small. Go from:
Physical activity becomes more important later. Not because it causes huge weight loss but because it's one of the best tools we have for keeping weight off. What About Weight Loss Drugs? GLP-1 medication drugs are more effective than previous weight loss drugs and they can help people lose a significant amount of weight but they are not magic. They work best alongside:
And if someone stops taking the drug without changing their habits, most of the weight comes back. The drug is a tool not the whole toolbox. The Real Answer: Multiple Small Wins The biggest message from this lecture is that there is no single thing that fixes weight gain. Diet on its own has a small effect. Exercise on its own has a small effect. Medication on its own has a small effect. But when you combine them, the effect becomes much more powerful. That is why the most effective approach usually includes:
In other words: You do not need one perfect solution. You need enough small things working in the same direction. Because long-term weight loss is not about finding the most extreme plan. It is about building a way of eating and living that works in the real world. In the final part of this series we'll discuss how to make weight loss work for you in the modern world.  If you have gained weight over the years, it probably did not happen because you suddenly became lazy. And it probably was not because you “lost your willpower.” Most people do not wake up one day and decide they want to slowly gain 5, 10 or 20 kilos. It just... happens. A few extra snacks here. A takeaway meal there. A busier job. More driving. Less movement. Bigger portions. More stress. Then one day your clothes feel tighter and you wonder: “How did I get here?” The answer is not that you are weak. The answer is that your body and your environment are working together in a way that makes weight gain surprisingly easy. We Are Built For A Different World Humans evolved in a world where food was hard to find. For most of human history:
So we evolved a body that is very good at three things:
That was useful when the next meal might be days away but now we live in a world where:
We are running ancient software in a very modern world. Imagine giving a caveman a smartphone, Uber Eats and a supermarket the size of a football field. Of course he would overeat. Most of us do exactly the same thing. The Modern World Is Designed To Make Eating Easy This did not happen by accident. Over the last 100 years, farming, food production, transport and technology have changed dramatically. Agriculture became mechanised. Food became cheaper to produce. Manufacturers learned how to make food last longer, taste better and be produced on a massive scale. After the Second World War, many countries quite rightly wanted to produce more food and make it more widely available. And they succeeded. We now have a global food system where food can be grown in one country, processed in another and sold anywhere in the world. Walk into a supermarket and you can buy strawberries in winter, snacks from overseas and highly processed food from every corner of the globe. The challenge is that this entire system is now deeply tied into modern life. Farmers, supermarkets, food companies, advertisers, transport networks and consumers are all part of the same system. The economy depends on people buying more, convenience matters more than ever, and food companies compete to make products cheaper, easier and more rewarding to eat. This is why changing the way we eat is not simply a matter of “trying harder.” We are all living inside a food environment that has been carefully built over decades to make eating easy and convenient. Professor Stubbs argues that this is not a conspiracy. It is the result of science, technology, economics and consumer culture all moving in the same direction. The problem is that our biology has not kept up. Professor James Stubbs describes this as an “Obesogenic environment.” That means an environment that quietly nudges us toward weight gain. Think about what the average day looks like:
You do not have to hunt for food anymore. Food now hunts for you. And most of that food is not just easy to get. It is designed to be very hard to stop eating. Highly processed foods are usually:
That combination makes it incredibly easy to eat more than your body needs without even realising it. The Body Does Not Fight Weight Gain Very Hard Most people assume the body works like a thermostat. Eat too much for a while and surely your body should naturally reduce your appetite and bring your weight back down. Unfortunately, it does not work that way. Professor Stubbs explains that the body is much better at defending against weight loss than weight gain. If you gain weight:
But if you lose weight, the opposite happens. Your body responds like there is a crisis:
In other words: Your body treats weight loss like an emergency. It treats weight gain like an inconvenience. That is one of the main reasons losing weight feels harder than gaining it. It is not because you are failing. It's because your biology was built to survive scarcity, not abundance. Why This Matters If you understand this, you stop blaming yourself. You realise that long-term weight gain is usually the result of:
That does not mean change is impossible but it does mean you need a better strategy than simply “trying harder.” You need systems that work with human nature instead of against it. In Part 2, we will look at why habits, stress, emotions and automatic behaviours often overpower our best intentions — and what you can do about it.  Before You Buy a Fat Burning Supplement, Read This
Fat Burners: What They Are, What’s Inside Them, and What the Research Actually Says Fat burners are one of the most popular categories of weight-loss supplements. They are sold with the promise that they will speed up your metabolism, increase fat burning, suppress appetite, and make weight loss easier. Usually, the label looks impressive. Caffeine. Green tea. Carnitine. CLA. Cayenne pepper. Chromium. Exotic plant extracts with names that sound like they came from a chemistry textbook. The marketing often suggests that combining lots of ingredients creates a powerful “fat-burning” effect. But when you look at the research, the story is much less dramatic. Most fat burners do not work the way they are advertised. A few ingredients have some evidence behind them. Most have weak, mixed, or very limited evidence. And even when an ingredient does increase fat oxidation (burning) in a study, the effect is usually small, temporary, or requires an amount that is not practical in the real world. What is a fat burner? A fat burner is usually marketed as a supplement that does one or more of the following:
The problem is that these are not all the same thing. A supplement might slightly increase fat oxidation in a laboratory and still have almost no meaningful effect on body weight. That distinction matters. Because “helps you burn a little more fat during exercise” is very different from “helps you lose a noticeable amount of body fat.” The ingredients that have the strongest evidence Caffeine Caffeine is one of the few ingredients with reasonably consistent evidence. It can increase energy expenditure and slightly increase fat oxidation (burning) at rest and during low-intensity exercise. In studies, even relatively small doses such as 100 mg of caffeine increased resting metabolic rate by 3–4%. Larger doses around 8 mg per kilogram of body weight produced bigger effects. For a 70 kg person, that would mean about 560 mg of caffeine. That is roughly:
That amount is enough to increase metabolism for a few hours, but it is also enough to cause side effects in many people:
More importantly, the increase in fat oxidation is usually less than 20% and does not seem to translate into meaningful long-term weight loss. In one long-term study, people taking caffeine while dieting did not lose more weight than people taking a placebo. The effect also appears to wear off in people who regularly consume a lot of caffeine. The big takeaway is that caffeine may give metabolism a small nudge. It is not a shortcut to major fat loss. Green tea extract Green tea extract is the other ingredient with some support. Green tea contains Catechins, especially EGCG, along with caffeine. Several studies found that green tea extract increased 24-hour fat oxidation by around 16–20%. The doses that appeared to work were usually around:
That sounds reasonable until you translate it into actual tea. To get 250 mg of EGCG from normal brewed green tea, you would usually need around 5–8 cups per day. Most people are not drinking that amount consistently. Even then, the effect on weight loss is modest. Across studies, people taking green tea extract lost only about 1–1.5 kg more than the control group over roughly 12 weeks. Green tea appears to work best in people who do not already consume a lot of caffeine. The takeaway here is that green tea extract may help a little, but the effect is small and nowhere near the dramatic claims on supplement labels. The ingredients that sound promising but do not hold up well include: L-carnitine Carnitine is often sold as a fat burner because it helps transport fat into the mitochondria where it can be used for energy. That sounds convincing. But taking a Carnitine supplement does not seem to meaningfully increase the amount of Carnitine inside muscle. Studies using up to 6 grams per day for two weeks found no increase in muscle Carnitine levels. More recent studies only managed to increase muscle Carnitine by combining:
That is the equivalent of deliberately eating a large amount of extra carbohydrate every day for six months just to produce a small change in muscle Carnitine. For someone trying to lose weight, that is not very practical. The takeaway here is that Carnitine is important inside the body but taking a carnitine supplement is unlikely to meaningfully increase fat loss. CLA (conjugated linoleic acid) CLA is one of those supplements that looks much better in animals than in humans. In rodents, CLA can dramatically reduce body fat. In humans, the effects are much smaller. The best evidence suggests that around 3.2 g per day may produce modest fat loss. How modest? About 0.05 kg per week. That is roughly:
Even that assumes people take it consistently for months. Some forms of CLA have also been linked to reduced insulin sensitivity, which raises questions about whether the small benefit is worth it. The takeaway here is that CLA may have a small effect but it is much smaller than the marketing suggests. Forskolin Forskolin is often included in fat burners because it may increase cAMP, a messenger involved in fat breakdown. There is one study showing that 250mg twice per day for 12 weeks improved body composition in overweight men. But that is one study. There is not enough evidence to know whether Forskolin consistently works, what dose is best, or whether the effect is reliable. Forskolin is an interesting idea but not enough evidence. Fucoxanthin and kelp Fucoxanthin is a compound found in brown seaweed and kelp. In animal studies, it reduced body fat but the problem is the dose. The animal studies used the equivalent of around 0.4% of body weight. For a 70 kg person, that would equal roughly 280 grams of Fucoxanthin per day. That is clearly unrealistic. Later human studies used much smaller amounts, around 2.4 mg per day, and found some positive results. But there is only one main human study and one of the authors was connected to the company selling the product. Fucoxanthan may be promising, but far too early to say it works. Chromium Chromium has been marketed for years as both a muscle builder and a fat burner. Most studies used around 200 micrograms per day. Despite the hype, the majority of studies found no meaningful effect on body composition or weight loss. Chromium is a great example of marketing moving much faster than the evidence. Taurine Taurine gets included in many fat-burner and energy-drink formulas. One study found that 1.66 g of taurine before exercise increased fat oxidation by about 16%. But the finding has not been consistently repeated and other studies found no effect. It is too early to know if taurine meaningfully helps. What about capsaicin and cayenne pepper? Capsaicin is the active compound in chilli peppers and cayenne pepper. It is often included in fat burners because it may slightly increase energy expenditure and fat oxidation. The theory is simple: Capsaicin increases sympathetic nervous system activity, which may make the body burn a few more calories. The problem is the amount required. The studies that show an effect usually use around 10 mg of Capsaicin or several grams of red pepper. To get that from food, you would need to eat the equivalent of several very hot chillies or multiple teaspoons of cayenne pepper every day. Most people would find that uncomfortable at best and impossible at worst. Even then, the increase in calorie burn is small, often only a few dozen calories per day. That is roughly the energy in half a banana. The bottom line is that Capsaicin may slightly increase metabolism but the effect is tiny and requires an amount that most people would not realistically consume. The biggest misunderstanding about fat burners. The biggest mistake people make is confusing: “this ingredient slightly increases fat oxidation” with “this supplement will noticeably speed up fat loss.” Those are not the same thing. Many ingredients can produce a small change in metabolism in a laboratory. But small changes do not automatically produce meaningful changes in body weight. For example:
The result is that the real-world effect often disappears. So, are fat burners worth it? If by “worth it” you mean: “Will this supplement dramatically speed up fat loss?” The answer is probably no. The ingredients with the best support are caffeine and green tea extract, and even they appear to have only small effects. Most of the other ingredients are either:
The supplement industry often sells fat burners as if they can bypass the need for consistent eating habits, exercise, sleep, and an overall calorie deficit. The research does not support that idea. Fat burners are usually marketed like a shortcut. But when you look closely, most of them are really just small nudges wrapped in very big promises. The practical takeaway is fairly striking:
The overall theme remains: Most fat burners create small metabolic changes at best, and often at doses that are impractical in real life. T The marketing is usually doing more work than the supplement. Here is the link to one of the most comprehensive reviews on Fat BURNING supplements. |
AuthorJohn Donaghey Categories |
RSS Feed
