 Why Weight Loss Is So Hard (And How To Finally Make It Work) In the first post in this series we covered the reasons why it is so easy to gain weight in modern life. In the second post I covered what we can start doing about it. Let's tie it all together in this last article. You’ve probably been told some version of this before: “Just be more disciplined.” “Stick to the plan.” “Try harder this time.” And if you’ve struggled to lose weight or keep it off, you’ve probably assumed the problem is you. It’s not. The real problem is that you're trying to change your body inside a system that is working against you and unless you understand that system, you’ll keep repeating the same cycle. The Reality Most People Don’t Tell You Around 80% of people who lose weight regain it. It's not because they don’t know what to do or because they lack motivation. But a combination of:
Most people start strong. They lose some weight then life happens. They lapse → regain → try again → repeat. It’s the default pattern for many diets and weight loss attempts. You’re Fighting Two Forces (Not One) When you try to lose weight, you’re dealing with two major tensions: 1. Your Biology Pushes Back Your body doesn’t want you to lose weight. When you diet:
Even more frustrating is that a lot of this happens outside your awareness. You think you’re still “on track" but your energy intake slowly creeps up over time. 2. Your Psychology Pulls You Back At the same time, you’re trying to:
And this creates a conflict of: Old habits vs new behaviours You want to change but you also want comfort, convenience, and pleasure. That tension is real and it’s one of the biggest reasons diets don’t last. Why Willpower Isn’t The Answer This is where most people go wrong. They treat weight loss like a discipline problem. But willpower is finite, unreliable and highly influenced by stress, fatigue, and your environment. You can make great decisions at 8am and completely different ones at 8pm. And it's not because you’re weak, it's because your system is overloaded. The People Who Succeed Do This Differently The data is clear:
Even the most successful people:
There is no perfect run, just better systems. What Actually Works (A Better Approach) Instead of relying on willpower you need a system. A multi-component approach. That means combining:
And making it fit your life, not the other way around. The Missing Piece: Understanding Yourself Here’s where this gets interesting. People don’t all eat for the same reasons. Some people eat for:
And if you don’t understand your drivers, you’ll pick the wrong strategy. For Example:
This is why “one-size-fits-all diets” fail. If Your Plan Feels Miserable, It Won’t Last This might be the most important point in the entire series: If your approach reduces your overall enjoyment of life, it’s unlikely to be sustainable. You’re not just trying to lose weight, you’re trying to build a way of living you can actually maintain. That means:
The 5 Principles To Make This Work If you take nothing else from this, take this: 1. Use evidence-based strategies. Don’t rely on trends, hacks, or guesswork. 2. Expect resistance. Your body and mind will push back so plan for it. 3. Track what matters. Awareness beats guesswork. 4. Understand your behaviour. Know why you eat, not just what you eat. 5. Keep pleasure in the plan. If it feels like punishment, it won’t last. Final Thought Weight loss isn’t about finding the perfect diet. It’s about:
The people who succeed aren’t more disciplined. They’re just better at playing the game.
5 Comments
 What Can We Do About It?
In the first post, we looked at why so many people gain weight in the modern world. We are running ancient software in a very modern environment. Our brains evolved in a world where food was scarce. Now we live in a world where food is everywhere, available 24/7 and designed to make us want more. So the obvious next question is: What can we do about it? The frustrating answer is that there is no single fix. No magic diet. No fat-burning supplement. No metabolism hack. No product you can wear, drink or rub onto your skin. (Although - the drugs are doing a good job now) The weight loss industry is full of promises to “lose 10lbs in a week” or “boost your metabolism instantly.” Those claims are everywhere because they are exciting and because we all want an easier answer. But they are not true. You cannot lose 10lbs of body fat in a week. We still have to obey the laws of thermodynamics. If something promises to “hack” the energy balance equation, it is probably not evidence-based. The problem is not that people are lazy. The problem is that people are surrounded by tempting promises in an environment that makes weight gain easy and long-term weight loss difficult. Why Most Diets Fail Most diets try to solve the problem in one of three ways:
That is why there are so many different diets:
They all sound different but most of them are really doing the same thing: They are trying to get you to eat less. The problem is that most people do not stick with them. The average person in a large commercial weight loss programme lasts around six or seven weeks. Not because they are weak, because being hungry, feeling restricted and constantly thinking about food is exhausting. The best diet is not the perfect diet. It is the diet you can still follow six months from now. And one year from now. What the Evidence Actually Says When researchers look at the big picture, not just one study or one trendy headline, a few things matter more than anything else. The biggest factor is energy density. That means how many calories are packed into each gram of food. Foods that are high in calories but small in volume make it very easy to eat more than we realise. Think:
These foods are usually high in fat and sugar, low in water and easy to eat quickly. They are highly rewarding, but not very filling. On the other hand, foods that are lower in energy density help us feel fuller with fewer calories. These foods tend to have:
Think:
According to the Professor James Stubbs, the characteristics of an evidence-based diet are surprisingly simple:
That last point matters more than most people realise. If your diet is miserable, you will not stay on it. Why We Eat When We Are Not Hungry One of the most useful ideas from the lecture I attended is that we do not only eat because we are hungry. We eat because:
That is why willpower is such an unreliable strategy. You can make a great decision at 8am, then have a stressful day, skip lunch, walk into the kitchen at 8pm and suddenly the biscuits “just happen.” This is not because you have failed. It's because you are human. Professor Stubbs calls this “dual processing.” Part of the brain wants the long-term goal and the other part wants immediate comfort, pleasure and relief. And in a world where food is cheap, easy and constantly available, the short-term part often wins. Why Exercise Helps Less Than People Think Most people believe exercise is the main way to lose weight and it does help but not in the way most people think. Exercise alone tends to produce surprisingly small changes in body weight. Even diet and exercise together often produce average weight losses of less than 5% of body weight. Why? Because creating a large calorie deficit through exercise is hard especially if somebody is already overweight, unfit or exhausted. The less fit you are, the harder exercise feels and that does not mean it isn't working. It just means exertion feels much greater when fitness is low. This is why “go hard or go home” often backfires. The evidence suggests something much simpler: Start small. Go from:
Physical activity becomes more important later. Not because it causes huge weight loss but because it's one of the best tools we have for keeping weight off. What About Weight Loss Drugs? GLP-1 medication drugs are more effective than previous weight loss drugs and they can help people lose a significant amount of weight but they are not magic. They work best alongside:
And if someone stops taking the drug without changing their habits, most of the weight comes back. The drug is a tool not the whole toolbox. The Real Answer: Multiple Small Wins The biggest message from this lecture is that there is no single thing that fixes weight gain. Diet on its own has a small effect. Exercise on its own has a small effect. Medication on its own has a small effect. But when you combine them, the effect becomes much more powerful. That is why the most effective approach usually includes:
In other words: You do not need one perfect solution. You need enough small things working in the same direction. Because long-term weight loss is not about finding the most extreme plan. It is about building a way of eating and living that works in the real world. In the final part of this series we'll discuss how to make weight loss work for you in the modern world.  If you have gained weight over the years, it probably did not happen because you suddenly became lazy. And it probably was not because you “lost your willpower.” Most people do not wake up one day and decide they want to slowly gain 5, 10 or 20 kilos. It just... happens. A few extra snacks here. A takeaway meal there. A busier job. More driving. Less movement. Bigger portions. More stress. Then one day your clothes feel tighter and you wonder: “How did I get here?” The answer is not that you are weak. The answer is that your body and your environment are working together in a way that makes weight gain surprisingly easy. We Are Built For A Different World Humans evolved in a world where food was hard to find. For most of human history:
So we evolved a body that is very good at three things:
That was useful when the next meal might be days away but now we live in a world where:
We are running ancient software in a very modern world. Imagine giving a caveman a smartphone, Uber Eats and a supermarket the size of a football field. Of course he would overeat. Most of us do exactly the same thing. The Modern World Is Designed To Make Eating Easy This did not happen by accident. Over the last 100 years, farming, food production, transport and technology have changed dramatically. Agriculture became mechanised. Food became cheaper to produce. Manufacturers learned how to make food last longer, taste better and be produced on a massive scale. After the Second World War, many countries quite rightly wanted to produce more food and make it more widely available. And they succeeded. We now have a global food system where food can be grown in one country, processed in another and sold anywhere in the world. Walk into a supermarket and you can buy strawberries in winter, snacks from overseas and highly processed food from every corner of the globe. The challenge is that this entire system is now deeply tied into modern life. Farmers, supermarkets, food companies, advertisers, transport networks and consumers are all part of the same system. The economy depends on people buying more, convenience matters more than ever, and food companies compete to make products cheaper, easier and more rewarding to eat. This is why changing the way we eat is not simply a matter of “trying harder.” We are all living inside a food environment that has been carefully built over decades to make eating easy and convenient. Professor Stubbs argues that this is not a conspiracy. It is the result of science, technology, economics and consumer culture all moving in the same direction. The problem is that our biology has not kept up. Professor James Stubbs describes this as an “Obesogenic environment.” That means an environment that quietly nudges us toward weight gain. Think about what the average day looks like:
You do not have to hunt for food anymore. Food now hunts for you. And most of that food is not just easy to get. It is designed to be very hard to stop eating. Highly processed foods are usually:
That combination makes it incredibly easy to eat more than your body needs without even realising it. The Body Does Not Fight Weight Gain Very Hard Most people assume the body works like a thermostat. Eat too much for a while and surely your body should naturally reduce your appetite and bring your weight back down. Unfortunately, it does not work that way. Professor Stubbs explains that the body is much better at defending against weight loss than weight gain. If you gain weight:
But if you lose weight, the opposite happens. Your body responds like there is a crisis:
In other words: Your body treats weight loss like an emergency. It treats weight gain like an inconvenience. That is one of the main reasons losing weight feels harder than gaining it. It is not because you are failing. It's because your biology was built to survive scarcity, not abundance. Why This Matters If you understand this, you stop blaming yourself. You realise that long-term weight gain is usually the result of:
That does not mean change is impossible but it does mean you need a better strategy than simply “trying harder.” You need systems that work with human nature instead of against it. In Part 2, we will look at why habits, stress, emotions and automatic behaviours often overpower our best intentions — and what you can do about it.  Before You Buy a Fat Burning Supplement, Read This
Fat Burners: What They Are, What’s Inside Them, and What the Research Actually Says Fat burners are one of the most popular categories of weight-loss supplements. They are sold with the promise that they will speed up your metabolism, increase fat burning, suppress appetite, and make weight loss easier. Usually, the label looks impressive. Caffeine. Green tea. Carnitine. CLA. Cayenne pepper. Chromium. Exotic plant extracts with names that sound like they came from a chemistry textbook. The marketing often suggests that combining lots of ingredients creates a powerful “fat-burning” effect. But when you look at the research, the story is much less dramatic. Most fat burners do not work the way they are advertised. A few ingredients have some evidence behind them. Most have weak, mixed, or very limited evidence. And even when an ingredient does increase fat oxidation (burning) in a study, the effect is usually small, temporary, or requires an amount that is not practical in the real world. What is a fat burner? A fat burner is usually marketed as a supplement that does one or more of the following:
The problem is that these are not all the same thing. A supplement might slightly increase fat oxidation in a laboratory and still have almost no meaningful effect on body weight. That distinction matters. Because “helps you burn a little more fat during exercise” is very different from “helps you lose a noticeable amount of body fat.” The ingredients that have the strongest evidence Caffeine Caffeine is one of the few ingredients with reasonably consistent evidence. It can increase energy expenditure and slightly increase fat oxidation (burning) at rest and during low-intensity exercise. In studies, even relatively small doses such as 100 mg of caffeine increased resting metabolic rate by 3–4%. Larger doses around 8 mg per kilogram of body weight produced bigger effects. For a 70 kg person, that would mean about 560 mg of caffeine. That is roughly:
That amount is enough to increase metabolism for a few hours, but it is also enough to cause side effects in many people:
More importantly, the increase in fat oxidation is usually less than 20% and does not seem to translate into meaningful long-term weight loss. In one long-term study, people taking caffeine while dieting did not lose more weight than people taking a placebo. The effect also appears to wear off in people who regularly consume a lot of caffeine. The big takeaway is that caffeine may give metabolism a small nudge. It is not a shortcut to major fat loss. Green tea extract Green tea extract is the other ingredient with some support. Green tea contains Catechins, especially EGCG, along with caffeine. Several studies found that green tea extract increased 24-hour fat oxidation by around 16–20%. The doses that appeared to work were usually around:
That sounds reasonable until you translate it into actual tea. To get 250 mg of EGCG from normal brewed green tea, you would usually need around 5–8 cups per day. Most people are not drinking that amount consistently. Even then, the effect on weight loss is modest. Across studies, people taking green tea extract lost only about 1–1.5 kg more than the control group over roughly 12 weeks. Green tea appears to work best in people who do not already consume a lot of caffeine. The takeaway here is that green tea extract may help a little, but the effect is small and nowhere near the dramatic claims on supplement labels. The ingredients that sound promising but do not hold up well include: L-carnitine Carnitine is often sold as a fat burner because it helps transport fat into the mitochondria where it can be used for energy. That sounds convincing. But taking a Carnitine supplement does not seem to meaningfully increase the amount of Carnitine inside muscle. Studies using up to 6 grams per day for two weeks found no increase in muscle Carnitine levels. More recent studies only managed to increase muscle Carnitine by combining:
That is the equivalent of deliberately eating a large amount of extra carbohydrate every day for six months just to produce a small change in muscle Carnitine. For someone trying to lose weight, that is not very practical. The takeaway here is that Carnitine is important inside the body but taking a carnitine supplement is unlikely to meaningfully increase fat loss. CLA (conjugated linoleic acid) CLA is one of those supplements that looks much better in animals than in humans. In rodents, CLA can dramatically reduce body fat. In humans, the effects are much smaller. The best evidence suggests that around 3.2 g per day may produce modest fat loss. How modest? About 0.05 kg per week. That is roughly:
Even that assumes people take it consistently for months. Some forms of CLA have also been linked to reduced insulin sensitivity, which raises questions about whether the small benefit is worth it. The takeaway here is that CLA may have a small effect but it is much smaller than the marketing suggests. Forskolin Forskolin is often included in fat burners because it may increase cAMP, a messenger involved in fat breakdown. There is one study showing that 250mg twice per day for 12 weeks improved body composition in overweight men. But that is one study. There is not enough evidence to know whether Forskolin consistently works, what dose is best, or whether the effect is reliable. Forskolin is an interesting idea but not enough evidence. Fucoxanthin and kelp Fucoxanthin is a compound found in brown seaweed and kelp. In animal studies, it reduced body fat but the problem is the dose. The animal studies used the equivalent of around 0.4% of body weight. For a 70 kg person, that would equal roughly 280 grams of Fucoxanthin per day. That is clearly unrealistic. Later human studies used much smaller amounts, around 2.4 mg per day, and found some positive results. But there is only one main human study and one of the authors was connected to the company selling the product. Fucoxanthan may be promising, but far too early to say it works. Chromium Chromium has been marketed for years as both a muscle builder and a fat burner. Most studies used around 200 micrograms per day. Despite the hype, the majority of studies found no meaningful effect on body composition or weight loss. Chromium is a great example of marketing moving much faster than the evidence. Taurine Taurine gets included in many fat-burner and energy-drink formulas. One study found that 1.66 g of taurine before exercise increased fat oxidation by about 16%. But the finding has not been consistently repeated and other studies found no effect. It is too early to know if taurine meaningfully helps. What about capsaicin and cayenne pepper? Capsaicin is the active compound in chilli peppers and cayenne pepper. It is often included in fat burners because it may slightly increase energy expenditure and fat oxidation. The theory is simple: Capsaicin increases sympathetic nervous system activity, which may make the body burn a few more calories. The problem is the amount required. The studies that show an effect usually use around 10 mg of Capsaicin or several grams of red pepper. To get that from food, you would need to eat the equivalent of several very hot chillies or multiple teaspoons of cayenne pepper every day. Most people would find that uncomfortable at best and impossible at worst. Even then, the increase in calorie burn is small, often only a few dozen calories per day. That is roughly the energy in half a banana. The bottom line is that Capsaicin may slightly increase metabolism but the effect is tiny and requires an amount that most people would not realistically consume. The biggest misunderstanding about fat burners. The biggest mistake people make is confusing: “this ingredient slightly increases fat oxidation” with “this supplement will noticeably speed up fat loss.” Those are not the same thing. Many ingredients can produce a small change in metabolism in a laboratory. But small changes do not automatically produce meaningful changes in body weight. For example:
The result is that the real-world effect often disappears. So, are fat burners worth it? If by “worth it” you mean: “Will this supplement dramatically speed up fat loss?” The answer is probably no. The ingredients with the best support are caffeine and green tea extract, and even they appear to have only small effects. Most of the other ingredients are either:
The supplement industry often sells fat burners as if they can bypass the need for consistent eating habits, exercise, sleep, and an overall calorie deficit. The research does not support that idea. Fat burners are usually marketed like a shortcut. But when you look closely, most of them are really just small nudges wrapped in very big promises. The practical takeaway is fairly striking:
The overall theme remains: Most fat burners create small metabolic changes at best, and often at doses that are impractical in real life. T The marketing is usually doing more work than the supplement. Here is the link to one of the most comprehensive reviews on Fat BURNING supplements.  The Complete Guide to Creatine Creatine is one of the most researched supplements in sports nutrition. It’s also one of the most misunderstood. Some people think it’s only for bodybuilders. Some think it causes bloating. Some worry it’s bad for the kidneys. Others have no idea what it actually does, but take it anyway because someone at the gym told them to. So let’s clear it up. This guide will walk you through what creatine is, how it works, how much to take, whether it’s safe, and who it may help. Before we go further, it’s worth saying this: You do not need creatine to get results. If your training is inconsistent, your protein intake is low, and your sleep is poor… creatine is not the thing holding you back. This is a supplement that supports good training. It doesn’t replace it. What is creatine? Creatine is a naturally occurring compound found in your body and in foods like meat and fish. Your body also makes some creatine on its own. Most of it is stored in your muscles, where it helps produce quick energy during short, intense efforts. That means creatine is especially useful for things like:
It helps your body regenerate ATP, which is your cells’ immediate energy source. So no, creatine is not a steroid. It’s not a hormone either. It’s a nutrient that helps support rapid energy production. Is creatine well studied? Yes. It's extremely well studied. Creatine monohydrate is one of the most researched supplements we have. It has been studied for decades in areas like strength, muscle gain, exercise performance, recovery, aging, and brain health. That doesn’t mean every claim made about creatine is equally strong. But it does mean this is not some trendy supplement built on hope and branding. The evidence base is real. What type of creatine should I take? Creatine monohydrate. That’s the one. There are plenty of other versions on the market, but creatine monohydrate is the form with by far the most research behind it. It’s also effective, widely available, and usually the cheapest option. You do not need a fancy version. In supplement world, boring often wins. This is one of those cases. How much creatine should I take? There are two common options. Option 1: Loading phase Take 20 grams per day for 5–7 days, split into 4 doses of 5 grams. Then take 3–5 grams per day after that. Option 2: Standard daily dose Take 3–5 grams per day from the start. Both approaches work. The loading phase gets your muscles saturated faster. The lower daily dose gets you to the same place more gradually. For most people, 3–5 grams per day is simple and effective. When should I take creatine? The most important thing is consistency. You do not need perfect timing. You do not need to take it at the exact second your workout ends. Take it whenever you’re most likely to remember it.
The best time is the time you’ll actually take it. Does creatine work? Yes. But this is where creatine is often misunderstood. It doesn’t create results on its own. It helps you get slightly more out of work you’re already doing well. So if you’re not training consistently, or you’re skipping the basics, you won’t notice much. But if you are consistent, those small improvements can add up over time. But it does work and Creatine works best for short, intense, repeated efforts. It can help improve training quality by giving you a little more fuel for hard exercise and helping you recover faster between sets or repeated bouts of work. That can mean:
That “slightly” matters. Because training results are often built on small improvements repeated over weeks and months. Is creatine good for building muscle and strength? Yes. Creatine is most effective as a training aid. It doesn’t build muscle by magic. It helps you train better, and better training can lead to better results. People who combine creatine with resistance training generally gain more strength and lean mass than those doing the same training without it. It helps the basics work better and that’s exactly what a good supplement should do. Is the weight gain from creatine just water? Not exactly. Creatine can increase water inside the muscle cell, especially early on. That can show up as a small increase on the scale. But calling it “just water weight” misses the point. That water is stored inside the muscle, not as random puffiness. And that cellular hydration may actually help create a better environment for muscle growth and adaptation. So yes, some early weight gain can be related to water. But no, that doesn’t make creatine fake progress. Does creatine help endurance exercise? Not in the same way it helps lifting, sprinting, or repeated hard efforts. Creatine is not mainly an endurance supplement. It’s more useful for activities that involve repeated bursts of high intensity within a session or event. So it may help with sprint finishes, repeat efforts, or hard surges inside endurance sports. That makes it more relevant for some team sport and mixed-intensity athletes than for someone doing long, steady-state efforts only. Is creatine safe? For healthy adults using recommended doses, creatine is considered safe. This is one of the biggest myths around creatine. A lot of people worry about kidneys, but research in healthy individuals has not shown that creatine damages kidney function when used appropriately. That said, people with known kidney disease or significant medical issues should check with their doctor before taking it. That’s just common sense. Does creatine cause cramps or muscle damage? The evidence does not support that. Creatine has not been shown to increase muscle cramping, injuries, or muscle damage in healthy users. Some studies even suggest it may help recovery. So the old “creatine causes cramps” line really needs to be retired. Is creatine only for muscle and gym performance? No. This is where creatine gets even more interesting. The strongest evidence is still for muscle performance, strength training, and repeated high-intensity exercise. But there is growing interest in creatine for:
The brain side of the research is promising, but it’s still less settled than the muscle side. So I’d look at it like this: Muscle and performance benefits: strong evidence. Brain and cognition benefits: promising, but still emerging. That’s the balanced take. Who should consider taking creatine? Creatine may be worth considering if you:
Final thoughts Creatine monohydrate is one of the few supplements that genuinely deserves the hype. It is well studied. It is effective. It is affordable. And for healthy adults, it is considered safe when used properly. The simplest recommendation for most people is: Take 3–5 grams of creatine monohydrate per day and keep lifting. That won’t solve bad programming, poor sleep, or inconsistent effort. But it can help good training work a little better. And that’s usually where the real value is. Should you take creatine? Not necessarily. Creatine is useful. It’s well supported by research. But it’s not essential. You’ll likely benefit from creatine if you:
But it’s probably not a priority if:
In those cases, creatine is solving the wrong problem. You’ll get far more return from:
Creatine is a “next layer” tool. Not a starting point. The Complete Guide to Creatine Creatine has one of the worst branding problems in nutrition. - Some people think it is a steroid. - Some think it is only for bodybuilders. - Some think it ruins your kidneys. - Some think it just makes you hold water. And yet, when you look at the actual research, creatine monohydrate is one of the most studied and consistently effective sports supplements we have. It can improve performance in brief, high-intensity exercise, help people get more out of resistance training, and may also have benefits beyond muscle, including possible cognitive and neuroprotective effects, though that area is still developing. So let’s dispel the myths. This guide will answer the main questions people usually ask: - What is creatine? - Is it well studied? - Does it work? - How much should you take? - What type should you use? - Is it safe? - Is it only useful for muscle and gym performance? What is creatine? Creatine is a naturally occurring compound found in the body and in foods like meat and fish. Your body also makes it in small amounts, mainly through the liver, kidneys, and pancreas. Once produced or consumed, most of it is stored in skeletal muscle, where it helps with rapid energy production. Its main performance role comes from the phosphocreatine system. That sounds technical, but the basic idea is simple: when your body needs energy fast, phosphocreatine helps regenerate ATP, which is the immediate energy currency your cells use. This is especially important during short, intense efforts like sprinting, jumping, lifting weights, or repeated hard intervals. So creatine is not a stimulant. It is not a hormone and it is not an anabolic drug. It is a nutrient that helps your body produce energy quickly when demand is high. Is creatine well studied? Yes. Very. Creatine has been studied for decades, and modern supplementation research in humans stretches back many years. The broader scientific consensus is that creatine monohydrate is one of the most researched ergogenic aids in sports nutrition. That is a big reason it stands apart from the average supplement on the shelf. That matters because the supplement industry is full of products with flashy claims and flimsy evidence. Creatine is the opposite. It has been examined across performance, resistance training, body composition, recovery, rehabilitation, aging, and increasingly cognitive health. In plain English: It is one of the few supplements that actually earned its reputation. What type of creatine should I take? Creatine monohydrate. That is the answer for almost everyone. There are dozens of creatine products on the market: hydrochloride, buffered creatine, nitrate, ethyl ester, gummy blends, fancy branded versions with premium pricing and very persuasive labels. But nearly all of the meaningful research on efficacy and safety has been done on creatine monohydrate. It is also highly bioavailable and usually the most affordable option. So if your goal is to improve muscle function, exercise performance, training quality, or potentially support broader health outcomes, there is no strong evidence-based reason to pay extra for a more exotic form. This is one of those rare moments in nutrition where the boring option wins. How much creatine should I take? There are two common ways to take creatine monohydrate. Option 1: Loading phaseTake around 20 grams per day, usually split into 4 doses of 5 grams, for 5 to 7 days. After that, take a maintenance dose of 3 to 5 grams per day. Option 2: Slow and steadyTake 3 to 5 grams per day from the start. This will still raise muscle creatine stores, it just takes longer, usually around 3 to 4 weeks. The destination is broadly the same. The difference is the speed. A loading phase is useful if someone wants faster saturation, perhaps because they are starting a training block soon or want to feel the effects earlier. But if someone is patient, the lower daily dose works well too. For most general gym-goers, 3 to 5 grams per day is the simplest, easiest recommendation. When should I take creatine? The timing matters much less than consistency. There is no magical 17-minute post-workout window here. The main goal is to saturate muscle stores over time. Whether you take it with breakfast, after training, or stirred into a smoothie in the afternoon matters less than taking it regularly. Some people prefer taking it with a meal because it helps them remember. That is a smart reason. “Because my routine supports it” beats “because an influencer said 6:14 pm is anabolic.” Do creatine supplements actually work? Yes, especially for the kind of exercise where fast energy production matters. The strongest evidence is for brief, high-intensity exercise and repeated bouts of hard effort. That includes things like sprinting, jumping, lifting, repeated intervals, and team-sport efforts that involve repeated bursts of work. Creatine is particularly useful when exercise is:
That is why creatine is such a natural fit for strength training. It helps people do slightly more high-quality work, recover better between hard efforts, and over time that can contribute to better training adaptations. That “slightly more” matters.
That is how real results tend to happen. Not by magic. By small improvements repeated often enough to matter. How does creatine improve performance? There are two main buckets to think about: 1. It improves immediate fuel availability. When muscle creatine stores are higher, phosphocreatine availability is higher too. That helps regenerate ATP more quickly during intense efforts. In practical terms, that can improve performance in short, hard, explosive work and help with recovery between repeated bouts. 2. It improves training quality over time. If you can train a little harder, do a few more reps, sustain output across sets, or recover faster between repeated efforts, your training quality improves. Over weeks and months, that can lead to better strength and hypertrophy outcomes. This is one of the most important things to understand about creatine: Creatine does not build muscle in the same way a drug does. It helps create a better environment for training and adaptation. That distinction matters. Is creatine good for strength and muscle growth? Yes. This is one of the clearest use cases. Meta-analyses show that when creatine supplementation is combined with resistance training, it improves strength outcomes and tends to produce a small additional benefit for lean mass and hypertrophy compared with resistance training alone. So if two people both lift weights well, eat reasonably well, and one uses creatine while the other uses a placebo, the Creatine user will often gain slightly more strength and, on average, slightly more lean tissue over time. That does not mean creatine replaces good programming, protein, sleep, or effort. It means it helps the basics work a little better. Which, honestly, is what a useful supplement should do. Does creatine just cause water retention? This is where people get confused. Creatine does increase water content inside muscle cells, especially early on. But that is not the same thing as saying it is “just water weight.” Intracellular water is different from the bloated, puffy story people often imagine. Cell hydration may actually be part of the signaling environment that supports training adaptation. So yes, some of the early increase in body mass with creatine can be related to water being drawn into the muscle. But that does not make it fake progress. Over time, creatine combined with resistance training can also contribute to greater lean mass gains than training alone. The lazy version is: “It’s just water.” The more accurate version is: “Some of the early weight change is water inside the muscle, and that may be part of why the muscle cell becomes a better environment for performance and adaptation.” Does creatine help endurance performance? Usually not in the same direct way it helps strength or sprint work. Creatine is not primarily an endurance supplement. It does not consistently improve steady-state endurance performance the way it improves repeated high-intensity efforts. But it may help with sprint finishes, repeated surges, or high-intensity bursts within endurance events. So a marathon runner should not expect creatine to suddenly turn them into a different athlete. But a cyclist, football player, boxer, rower, or field sport athlete who has to produce repeated intense efforts inside a broader event may see benefits. Does creatine help with glycogen and recovery? There is evidence that creatine can support glycogen storage, particularly when combined with carbohydrate loading, and that may be one reason it helps repeated high-intensity performance and recovery between bouts of work. Some research also suggests creatine may support rehabilitation and recovery processes, though this is not as universally settled as the strength-performance literature. This is one of the reasons creatine may be useful beyond just “big lifts in the gym.” If your sport or training involves repeated hard efforts, short recovery windows, or dense training blocks, creatine may help support the fuel side of the equation. Can creatine help during injury, immobilisation, or rehab? Possibly, and this is a genuinely interesting area. Periods of immobilisation or reduced activity can lead to declines in muscle mass, function, and metabolic health. There is some evidence that creatine may help preserve aspects of muscle during disuse or support rehabilitation, but the results across studies are mixed and context matters. That means the honest answer is not “definitely yes.” It is: “There is promising evidence, and it may be useful, but it is not as ironclad as the evidence for strength training and repeated high-intensity performance.” That is still a pretty useful place for a supplement to be. Is creatine safe? For healthy people using recommended doses, the evidence is very reassuring. Large reviews and position stands have consistently concluded that creatine monohydrate is generally safe and well tolerated when used appropriately. Long-term data in healthy individuals do not show convincing evidence that creatine harms kidney function. This is the part that gets distorted online. Creatine can increase serum creatinine, which is a blood marker sometimes used in kidney screening. But that does not automatically mean kidney damage is occurring. Creatinine is a breakdown product related to creatine metabolism, so this marker can be misread if someone does not understand the context. That said, caution is sensible in people with known kidney disease or complex medical issues. Those people should talk with their clinician before supplementing. That is not because creatine has been proven dangerous in healthy populations. It is because medical conditions change the risk conversation. Does creatine cause cramps, strains, or muscle damage? The evidence does not support the idea that creatine causes more muscle cramping, strains, or injuries in healthy users. In fact, some research has suggested neutral or even favourable effects on recovery markers, though the literature is not perfect. The safest conclusion is this: There is no good evidence that creatine increases muscle damage or dysfunction when used properly in healthy individuals. That matters because this myth has hung around for years like a bad gym rumour that refuses to die. Is creatine only for bodybuilders and young male athletes? Not at all. Creatine is useful for anyone doing the kind of training or sport that relies on brief, repeated, high-intensity effort. But beyond that, there is growing interest in its role in older adults, clinical populations, rehabilitation, and brain health. Older adults may benefit because maintaining muscle mass and strength becomes more important with age. And since resistance training itself becomes more valuable with age, anything that helps support better training quality can be relevant. This is a supplement with broader relevance than many people assume. What about creatine and the brain? This is one of the most interesting areas, but it is also where you need a more careful tone. There is emerging evidence that creatine may support aspects of cognitive function, especially under conditions of stress such as sleep deprivation, and recent reviews suggest possible benefits in areas like memory, attention, and processing speed. However, the effects are not as consistent or as robust as they are in skeletal muscle. The brain appears to regulate creatine differently from muscle, and increasing brain creatine may be harder or smaller in magnitude. Some expert reviews are optimistic, while other evaluations conclude that the current evidence is not yet strong enough to establish a clear cause-and-effect health claim for cognitive improvement in the general population. That is the key point. What we can say with confidence? Creatine and brain health is promising. There is enough evidence to take it seriously. What we should not say yet: That creatine is a guaranteed cognitive enhancer for everyone. The concussion and neuro-protection conversation is even more preliminary in humans. Animal data are encouraging, and the theoretical case is interesting, but this is not yet the sort of thing that should be marketed as settled fact in sport. So the practical stance is: If someone is taking creatine for muscular or training benefits, any possible brain-related upside may be an added bonus. But I would not lead with concussion protection as the primary sales pitch. Do vegetarians need creatine more than omnivores? Maybe, but the answer is a bit more nuanced than people think. Vegetarians generally consume less dietary creatine because creatine is found mainly in animal products. That means baseline creatine intake is lower. However, differences in tissue levels and response can vary, and while some individuals may respond particularly well, it is too simplistic to say that every vegetarian is automatically deficient in a meaningful functional sense. A more accurate way to say it is: Vegetarians may have more room to benefit from supplementation, but individual response still varies. Who is most likely to benefit from creatine? Creatine tends to make the most sense for:
It may also be worth considering in some rehab or brain-health contexts, but that is more case-by-case and more evidence-dependent. Who should be cautious? Creatine is generally safe for healthy adults, but extra caution is appropriate for people with:
That is not a flaw specific to creatine. That is just sensible practice whenever health status is more complicated. The simplest practical recommendation For most healthy adults who lift weights or do repeated high-intensity exercise: Take 3 to 5 grams of creatine monohydrate per day. That is the clean, evidence-based starting point. You do not need an expensive form. You do not need to cycle it. You do not need a pre-workout with a robot label. You do not need to overthink it. Just take the boring powder that has the best research behind it. Which is honestly a nice change from the usual supplement circus. Final thoughts Creatine is one of the rare supplements that deserves its reputation. It is well studied. It works. It is affordable. It is safe for healthy people when used appropriately. And it is useful for much more than “gym bros trying to get bigger.” Its strongest evidence is still in muscle and performance:
Its emerging evidence in cognition, rehabilitation, and neuro-protection is exciting, but that part of the story needs more precision and less hype. So if you want the short version: Creatine monohydrate is one of the most useful, evidence-based supplements available. It is not magic. But it is one of the few supplements that can genuinely help the basics work better. While creatine is effective, it’s not essential. Its benefits are most noticeable in individuals who are already training consistently and have the fundamentals in place. Like most supplements, it works best as a support tool rather than a replacement for good habits. Do you take Creatine?  Recently I had the pleasure of listening to a lecture on Fat Loss Physiology from Professor Bill Campbell, Ph.D. Professor Campbell has a Ph.D. in Exercise, Nutrition, and Preventive Health from Baylor University. He is currently a Professor of Exercise Science and Director of the Performance and Physique Enhancement Laboratory at the University of South Florida. His work has been published in over 200 scientific papers and abstracts, three textbooks, and 20 book chapters in areas related to physique enhancement, sports nutrition, resistance training, and dietary supplementation. He knows what he is talking about but his greatest skill is breaking down complex subjects in ways that most lay people can understand. A skill I admire. Below is a summary of the lecture that will hopefully help you see how fat loss actually works in the body and why an energy deficit and exercise are so important to achieve this goal. After reading this I hope you can dispel a lot of the nonsense out there and be more confident about your own approach. Enjoy. How Fat Loss Really Works: A Simple Guide
We hear it all the time: burn fat, melt fat, torch fat. But what actually happens inside your body when you lose fat? Let’s walk through it step by step, without the science jargon so you can dispel the nonsense when you see it. Fat Cells: Balloons That Shrink, Not Disappear Your body has fat cells (adipocytes). Think of them like balloons filled with fat. When you lose fat, the balloons don’t vanish, they simply deflate. Once you reach adulthood, you’ll have roughly the same number of fat cells for life. They may slowly “turn over” (about 10% die and get replaced each year), but the total number stays about the same. This is one reason why losing fat you gained as a kid or teenager can feel harder: childhood obesity often means you end up with more fat cells in adulthood. More balloons to keep filled. Breaking down fat vs Burning fat vs fat loss. The way that we lose fat is by being in a calorie deficit or expending more energy. But how does the body go about that. It doesn’t just vanish into thin air. It happens in 3 steps. Breaking Down Fat: The Peanut Analogy Losing fat happens in stages, a bit like eating a peanut:
Without a calorie deficit, the “chewed peanuts” just get re-packaged and stored again. Step 1: Breaking It Down (Lipolysis) When you have fat in your cells you must first break it down. Inside fat cells, fat is stored as triglycerides (three fatty acids plus a glycerol backbone). To use it for energy, enzymes act like scissors, cutting the fatty acids free. Now you have primed your body to lose body fat as long as other conditions are present (such as being in a calorie deficit or exercising). Can you see a theme here? This process is triggered by (hormones) signals, mainly adrenaline and norepinephrine (the same chemicals that fire when you exercise or are in a calorie deficit). These signals tell the receptors on our fat cells to do something. This is how hormones work - they are chemical messengers. We have two types of receptors that are important in this process:
There is a theory that the areas of your body that are “stubborn” (belly, hips, thighs) often have more alpha receptors, which is why fat there is usually the last to go. But that’s for another summary. Step 2: Burning It for Energy Once freed, fatty acids enter the bloodstream and hitch a ride on a protein called albumin (because fat and water don’t mix). They then travel to your muscles. There, they go through several “checkpoints” to get inside the mitochondria (your cell’s power plants). This is where they’re chopped up, piece by piece, in a process called beta-oxidation. That’s the real fat burning stage. Step 3: Actual Fat Loss Here’s the key:
That’s why exercise and diet are so important. They suppress this “re-esterification” (the re-packaging process) and make it more likely that fat actually gets burned and lost. If we are going to lose fat we have to:
Why Exercise Helps During exercise, especially cardio, your body releases more norepinephrine, flipping the “on switch” for fat breakdown. During strength training, you mostly burn carbs in the moment, but afterwards fat burning stays elevated for hours. This is also why a mix of lifting weights and cardio is so effective. What About Dieting? Fat loss only happens when you consistently use more energy than you eat. That doesn’t mean starving yourself forever. In fact, long diets backfire because people burn out. A smarter approach:
Most people can lose fat. Fewer can keep it off. Maintenance is a skill worth practicing. Key Takeaways
In short: Fat loss isn’t magic. It’s biology. The more you understand the process, the easier it is to ignore the fads and nonsense online.  You’re not lazy. You’re not broken.
You’re just living in a world that makes staying healthy really, really hard. We call it an obesogenic environment — a fancy term for “the modern world that encourages us to eat more and move less.” If you’ve ever wondered why staying consistent feels like a daily battle, this is why. Let’s explore what this means and then talk about what you can actually do about it. 1. Food Is Everywhere (and Designed to Be Irresistible) You can order a meal without leaving your couch. There’s a snack at every checkout. Coffee often comes with dessert in a cup. Food companies are brilliant at creating combinations of sugar, fat, and salt that light up your brain’s reward system. The result is that you’re surrounded by foods that are easy to overeat and hard to stop eating. How to combat this:
2. We Move Less Than Ever. Most of us don’t walk to work. We sit for hours, then unwind on the couch. Even chores like shopping or mowing the lawn are easier than ever. Movement used to be built into daily life. Now we have to schedule it. What helps combat this?
3. Our Brains Haven’t Caught Up. Your brain evolved to keep you alive, not lean. It’s wired to seek food, conserve energy, and avoid discomfort. The problem with this is the modern world gives your brain unlimited access to both food and comfort. That’s why motivation fades, and why “just be more disciplined” doesn’t work for long. What can you do about this?
👉 Keep fruit washed and ready to eat. 👉 Store crisps in the garage or high cupboard. 👉 Cancel junk food subscriptions or delivery shortcuts. 4. Environment Beats Willpower. When your environment is set up right, consistency takes less effort. You don’t rely on bursts of motivation, you rely on design. Think of it like this:
The goal isn’t perfection, it’s progress that feels sustainable. The Bottom Line. You don’t have to fight the modern world. You just need to outsmart it. The fittest people are not always the most disciplined. They make their environment work for them. Make your setup work for you, not against you. Small environmental changes compound into massive long-term results. If you’d like accountability, structure, and help designing an environment that makes fat loss easier and more consistent, I’m opening one spot in my 12-Week Reset Personal Training Program so you can shed some excess fat and start feeling comfortable in your own skin again. Click here and we can have a chat and I'll show you how the program works and you can go away and think about it. No pressure to sign up to anything.  Lifting to prevent arthritis? ⬇️
Does hitting the weights really make your bones stronger? The answer is a resounding yes! Let’s dig into the science behind this: 🔍 How Does Lifting Improve Bone Strength? Strength training increases bone density and fortifies bone strength. This is due to the osteogenic response, where bones adapt to the stress of weight lifting by becoming denser and tougher. 📚 Research Insights: A pivotal study by Kohrt et al., published in 2004, shows that regular resistance training stimulates bone formation and reduces bone resorption, leading to an overall increase in bone mineral density. 💪 Benefits of Stronger Bones: - Reduced Risk of Fractures: Stronger bones mean a lower chance of fractures as you age. - Improved Posture and Balance: Increased bone strength supports better posture and balance, essential for everyday activities. - Enhanced Athletic Performance: Strong bones provide a solid foundation for muscle attachment, improving athletic performance. 💡 Training Tips for Bone Health: - Focus on Weight-Bearing Exercises: Incorporate exercises like squats, deadlifts, and overhead presses. - Progressive Overload: Gradually increase the weight and intensity of your workouts to continue challenging your bones. Consistency is Key: Regular training is crucial for maintaining and improving bone density.  One of the most debated topics in fitness⬇️
Should you start with cardio or lift weights first? Here’s what the research says.... 🔍 What Does Research Say? A study by Cadore et al. (2012) found that the order of exercise can affect the acute hormonal response and long-term adaptations to training. For strength gains, it’s generally better to start with resistance training when you’re freshest, as pre-fatigue from cardio can impair your strength performance. Conversely, for goals focused on endurance or fat loss, starting with cardio can be beneficial. It can warm up your muscles and help you burn more calories from the start of your workout. 📊 Guidelines for Workout Order: - Strength Priority: - Begin with weight training to maximize your power output without the fatigue from cardio. - Endurance or Fat Loss Focus: - Start with a cardio session to kickstart calorie burning and enhance cardiovascular endurance. 💡 Why It Matters: Your primary fitness goal dictates the optimal order. Maximising performance in your first activity ensures you get the most benefit where it counts. |
AuthorJohn Donaghey Categories |
RSS Feed
